If you wanna get rich, get elected to Congress

 The wealth of members of the U.S. Congress varies widely, with many being millionaires due to a combination of their congressional salaries, prior business successes, investments, and sometimes inherited wealth or wealth from spouses. Here are some insights into the wealth of various members based on available data:

• Darrell Issa (R-CA) is often cited as one of the wealthiest members of Congress, with his wealth primarily from his car alarm business, Directed Electronics. His net worth has been reported to be around $283 million to $768 million.
• Rick Scott (R-FL) has a significant portion of his wealth from his tenure as a health care executive, notably from founding and later selling Columbia Hospital Corporation (now HCA Healthcare) and Solantic. His net worth has been estimated at over $300 million.

  
• Michael McCaul (R-TX) has a substantial net worth, much of which is attributed to his wife's inheritance from her father, Lowry Mays, who founded Clear Channel Communications. Estimates place his net worth between $200 million and $294 million.
• Mark Warner (D-VA) amassed significant wealth through his business ventures, including Columbia Capital, where he invested in telecommunication companies like Nextel. His net worth has been reported at around $30.8 million in certain investments and higher overall.

  
• Jared Polis (D-CO) before entering politics, was an entrepreneur, notably with an online greeting card company and other internet startups. His net worth was noted to be around $388 million in the past.
• Greg Gianforte (R-MT) made his fortune through software development and was listed as the wealthiest member of the U.S. House of Representatives with a net worth that has been reported to be over $189 million.

  

  
• Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and her husband, Paul Pelosi, have investments in real estate and stocks, contributing to her reported net worth, which has been stated to be around $114 million. However, some sources suggest it might be higher, with figures like $290 million mentioned in social media.

  
• Mitt Romney (R-UT) has a considerable fortune from his time at Bain Capital, with his net worth reported at around $174 million.

  

  
• Vern Buchanan (R-FL) has wealth from his car dealerships and other business ventures, with his net worth reported to be between $157 million.

  

  

These figures are estimates based on public disclosure forms and media analyses. They can change over time due to market fluctuations, new investments, or changes in asset values. Remember, these are broad strokes, and exact net worth can be difficult to pin down due to the nature of financial disclosures which use ranges rather than precise amounts. Also, wealth concentration among the top earners in Congress is significant, with a small percentage holding a large share of the total wealth of Congress members.

What ChatCPT says about the ICC

 The United States is not a party to the International Criminal Court (ICC). While the U.S. signed the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, in 2000 under President Bill Clinton, it never ratified it. In 2002, President George W. Bush formally "unsigned" the treaty, and the U.S. has consistently maintained a policy of opposition to the court.

The primary reasons for the U.S. not joining the ICC are concerns over sovereignty and the potential for politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. citizens, particularly military personnel or government officials, for actions related to armed conflicts. The U.S. government has also expressed concerns about the court's lack of accountability and the possibility of unfair trials.

However, while the U.S. is not bound by the ICC, it has sometimes cooperated with the court in specific cases, such as providing evidence or assistance in investigations. Moreover, the U.S. has supported other international tribunals, like those set up to prosecute war crimes in the Balkans and Rwanda.

In short, the U.S. does not abide by the ICC in terms of legal obligations, but it maintains a complex and cautious relationship with the court.